United Sovereign Americans
Our Work to Date
What the Data Shows
The result of the analyses completed using each state’s official records from the 2022 General Election is compiled into an Election Validity Scorecard, which illustrates the categories of irregularities in voter registrations and vote counts, and the discrepancies in officially reported election results.
Aggregate data for 20 states with completed scorecards
This work represents thousands of hours, and equates to millions of dollars in programming, analysis, and legal research, and has been done exclusively by volunteers with over 700 years of combined big data and auditing expertise. This work is subject to rigorous peer review. Each scorecard meets the standard of evidence in court and is filed with the federal lawsuit in its respective state and becomes a matter of public record.
Legal Action
Michigan
Lawsuit filed in Michigan on August 28, 2024. against Michigan election officials.
Amidst fears that noncitizens will impact the electoral outcome of 2024 races nationwide, United Sovereign Americans has filed suit against Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson, alleging that she failed to verify the authenticity of at least 57,978,855 facially invalid voter data records, regardless of citizenship status, and authorized at least 369,107 potentially illegal votes from these questionable registrants in the 2022 general election. Also named as defendant is Attorney General Dana Nessel, who Plaintiffs allege has failed to enforce state laws that would have prevented this civil rights injury to all qualified Michigan voters, and US Attorney General Merrick Garland, who has failed to enforce federal law. Joining United Sovereign Americans are Michigan Fair Elections Institute, Timothy Mauro-Vetter, Braden Giacobazzi, Phani Mantravadi, Philip O’Hallorin, Donna Brandenburg, and Nick Somberg. Representing the plaintiffs is Bruce L. Castor, Jr. of van der Veen, Hartshorn, Levin & Lindheim.
Petitioners assert these officials did not provide a legally reliable election in the 2022 general election, according to the standards set by the United States Congress. Petitioners have made numerous attempts to inform state officials of this problem, yet Defendants and their respective offices remain unwilling to examine evidence and bring the Michigan voting system into compliance. The Mandamus action seeks a court order that the 2024 election be conducted according to all applicable constitutional, federal, and state laws protecting the fundamental right of every American to choose representatives in a fairly and honestly conducted election.
To learn more, read the press release or the filing and the exhibits.
North Carolina
Lawsuit filed in North Carolina on August 28, 2024. to ensure a legal valid election in 2024
United Sovereign Americans has filed suit against the North Carolina State Board of Elections, alleging that it failed to verify the identity and eligibility of at least 1,122,761 facially invalid voter registrants, regardless of citizenship status, and authorized at least 514,008 potentially illegal votes from these questionable registrants in the 2022 general election. Also named as defendant is Attorney General Josh Stein, who Plaintiffs allege has failed to enforce state laws that would have prevented this civil rights injury to all qualified North Carolina voters, and US Attorney General Merrick Garland, who has failed to enforce federal law. Joining United Sovereign Americans is Richard Yost, a North Carolina voter who has submitted expert reports to NCSBE. Representing the plaintiffs is Bruce L. Castor, Jr. of van der Veen, Hartshorn, Levin & Lindheim.
Petitioners assert these officials did not provide a legally reliable election in the 2022 general election, according to the standards set by the United States Congress. The concern Plaintiffs raise is that the civil rights harm sustained by every qualified North Carolina voter in 2022, absent intervention by the court, will occur again in 2024 and subsequent federal elections.
To learn more, read the press release or the filing.
Texas
Lawsuit filed in Texas on August 28, 2024. to ensure a legal valid election in 2024.
United Sovereign Americans has filed suit against Texas Secretary of State Jane Nelson, alleging that she failed to verify the identity and eligibility of at least 1,352,202 facially invalid voter registrants, regardless of citizenship status, and authorized at least 196,658 potentially illegal votes from these questionable registrants in the 2022 general election. Also named as defendant is Attorney General Ken Paxton, who Plaintiffs allege has failed to enforce state laws that would have prevented this civil rights injury to all qualified Texas voters, and US Attorney General Merrick Garland, who has failed to enforce federal law. Joining United Sovereign Americans is the nonpartisan, nonprofit 501c3 Citizens Defending Freedom, and a candidate for US Congress, Bernard Johnson. Representing the plaintiffs is Bruce L. Castor, Jr. of van der Veen, Hartshorn, Levin & Lindheim.
Plaintiffs allege that Texas state officials counted 17,159 fewer votes than their records show voters having voted. Meanwhile Texas county officials counted 18,306 more votes than their records show voters having voted. In a reliable election, there would have been no more than 65 errors statewide.
The Mandamus action seeks a court order that the 2024 election be conducted according to all applicable constitutional, federal, and state laws protecting the fundamental right of every American to choose representatives in a fairly and honestly conducted election.
To learn more, read the press release or the filing and the exhibits.
Florida
Fourth lawsuit filed, this time in Florida on August 20, 2024.
United Sovereign Americans, in conjunction with various Florida voters, represented by Bruce Castor Jr. of van der Veen, Hartshorn, Levin, & Lindheim, has filed a federal lawsuit against the State of Florida, various state officials, the United States Department of Justice, and United States Attorney General Merrick Garland regarding errors in the results of the 2022 general election in Florida which rendered the results unreliable.
The lawsuit cites 564,732 apparent errors in the registration records resulting in 117,115 uncertain votes, as well as a discrepancy of over 145,000 more votes tabulated than voters who voted. “The Writ of Mandamus seeks this Court order Respondents to perform their ministerial functions by taking actions to rectify reliability issues event in the 2022 election.” These functions include “Ensuring that only properly registered citizen votes are cast in federal elections, that only votes properly cast are counted, that all voting systems are compliant with critical infrastructure standards assuring every ballot is correctly tabulated, and ensuring that the authenticity of every ballot counted can be proven by an unbroken chain of custody from the voter’s hand to the final certified result.”
To learn more, read the press release or the filing and the exhibits.
Ohio
Lawsuit filed in Ohio on August 8, 2024. to ensure a legal valid election in 2024.
United Sovereign Americans, Concerned Voters of Ohio, and various individual plaintiff voters, represented by Bruce L. Castor, III, of Thomas A. Will & Associates, have filed a federal lawsuit against the State of Ohio, Secretary of State Frank LaRose, state election officials, Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost, and United States Attorney General Merrick Garland regarding errors in the certified results of the 2022 election in Ohio which rendered those results unreliable.
The Plaintiffs cited 1,203,438 facially invalid registrations that accounted for 602,631 improperly counted votes, as well as a discrepancy of over 1 million more votes counted than voters who voted at the time of certification, and over 3,000 more votes counted than voters who voted when the election was later reconciled, exposing the plain fact that Ohio certified the election before all of the records were finalized correctly. Plaintiffs asserted in the suit the following:
- Respondents have denied Petitioners’ right to a fair vote.
- Respondents appear to have implemented procedures that have obscured the ability to audit the 2022 General Election, thereby rendering the outcomes factually unknowable at the time of certification.
- Respondents have violated multiple federal and state laws, or negligently allowed such violations to occur, while loudly proclaiming the infallibility of Ohio’s election results.
- Respondents insist the Petitioners have adequate voting rights, while simultaneously fighting from every conceivable angle to prevent Petitioners from attempting to protect those rights. Respondents’ collective actions in refusing to address the problem extinguish and undermine the very meaning of the right to vote in a fair democracy.
To learn more, read the full press release or the filing.
Pennsylvania
A historic lawsuit filed in Pennsylvania on June 18, 2024.
United Sovereign Americans, in conjunction with various Pennsylvania voters, represented by Bruce Castor Jr. of van der Veen, Hartshorn, Levin, & Lindheim, has filed a federal lawsuit against the State of Pennsylvania, various Commonwealth officials, the United States Department of Justice, and United States Attorney General Merrick Garland regarding errors in the results of the 2022 general election in Pennsylvania which rendered the results unreliable.
The lawsuit cites 3,192,069 apparent errors in the registration records resulting in 1,089,750 uncertain votes, as well as a discrepancy of over 9,000 more votes tabulated than voters who voted. “An error rate above the maximum permissible rate set by Congress renders an election uncertifiable because the results are unreliable. Nevertheless, Commonwealth officials certified the 2022 election.”
To learn more, read the full press release, the executive summary, or the filing.
Maryland
Our litigation process, launched in Maryland on March 6, 2024 and appealed in the fourth circuit on July 9, 2024.
A Reply Brief was filed on August 29, 2024.
Maryland Election Integrity LLC and United Sovereign Americans filed a Notice of Appeal in response to the lower court’s refusal to hear our case based on standing. By hiding behind the unqualified “standing” argument, Judge Gallagher is refusing to review this evidence and therefore, cast sunlight on truth. The ruling is very obviously flawed. If we don’t have standing to protect the right to vote, what do we have standing for? 150 years of Supreme Court precedent agrees.
The Board of Elections did not deny the allegations of what constitutes a broken election process from beginning to end; instead, they simply refuse to fix it. Their position is that no one can or will make them correct any of the errors. We certainly hope they are wrong, as should every Maryland voter.
Weekly Online Discussion and Training
Free and open to the public every Tuesday from 7-8:30 pm Eastern time, thousands of citizens from every state in the nation have attended our weekly online federal election law discussion and training program. Visit the Study Sessions page to see our latest recordings, and sign up to Stay Informed and be added to our email list to receive information on how to attend.
Media Appearances
Marly Hornik, CEO, and Harry Haury, Chairman, continually appear on national forums and podcasts as a call for the public to become educated and involved in Election Validity.
Sign up to stay informed of any new updates, including invitations to our weekly Study Sessions. You can opt out any time.