Unite4Freedom

Notices of Suspected Violations of Federal Law Filed with 24 Additional States

In addition to six previous Notices, Unite4Freedom (U4F) and additional aggrieved persons have filed a Notice of Violations and Demand for Corrective Action concerning the fulfillment of legal requirements under the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA) in 24 more states. The Notices are based on U4F analyses of the state’s official election records measured against federal and state law in Arizona, Arkansas, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Iowa, Kansas, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Rhode Island, Tennessee, Utah, Vermont, and Washington identifying 7,378,932 suspected violations that require investigation, explanation, correction, preservation, or disclosure under NVRA.

Each Notice identifies the statutory duties at issue, the categories of alleged violations, the supporting factual bases, all the individual records that appear to be in violation of legal requirements, and the corrective actions requested. The Election Validity Scorecard for each state is provided as a summary of the violations, but each one of the over 7.3 million total records provided for those 24 states must be resolved and explained.

Federal Requirements at Issue

Congress enacted NVRA to establish uniform national standards governing voter-registration administration, voter-list maintenance, and public inspection of records for them. Under federal law 52 USC § 20507(i), these records are supposed to be available for public inspection, and federal law has clarified that these records must be auditable, yet the states continue to obfuscate their records and hide the apparent non-compliance.

Section 20510(b) of NVRA authorizes an aggrieved person to provide written notice of violations to the chief state election official and affords the state an opportunity to investigate, correct, explain, or otherwise resolve those violations before civil litigation is initiated. A non-profit organization acting for the benefit of the American people, such as U4F, qualifies as a federally-defined aggrieved person. Under the law, the state has 20 days to investigate, prove the data is ok, or correct it.

If the errors are not corrected and procedures are not put in place to prevent a recurrence in 2026, U4F will seek to force the states to change their systems under the personal cause of action enshrined in NVRA. U4F will also continue supporting DOJ and the Administration’s efforts to clean up our broken election system nationwide.

Alleged Violations and Factual Basis of Notices

U4F has analyzed official voter-registration, voter-history, and related election records obtained from the State and its election officials. Those analyses resulted in state-specific Election Validity Scorecards and supporting machine-readable datasets identifying apparent violations. Both the Scorecards and datasets are included in the Notices as evidence of concern regarding the following statutory duties imposed by NVRA:

1. The duty to conduct a reasonable and uniform list-maintenance program consistent with 52 USC § 20507(a)(4). The following categories of record-level conditions in U4F’s analyses are areas of concern:

  • duplicate or conflicting voter registrations;
  • unexplained changes in voter registration status;
  • registrations containing internally inconsistent or illogical data;
  • apparent irregular registration changes;
  • registration conditions requiring documented explanation under established list-maintenance procedures; and other record level conditions.

A total of 7,378,932 unique votes were impacted by these conditions in the 24 states in the 2024 General Election.

U4F is not claiming that every documented concern establishes a violation of federal law, but rather that they require investigation, explanation, and documentation sufficient to determine whether the states have adhered to the requirements enacted by Congress.

2. The duty to maintain, preserve, and make available records concerning list-maintenance programs in
52 USC § 20507(i). Implementation records, implementation documentation, or explanatory materials for those record-level conditions are necessary to determine:

  • the basis for recorded changes;
  • the authority under which those changes occurred;
  • the implementation of voter-list maintenance procedures;
  • the preservation of required records; and
  • the completeness of the state’s public-inspection obligations under NVRA.

This Notice requests the production or inspection of those implementation records as part of the corrective actions described above. If the records do not exist, this Notice requests written confirmation identifying the specific records unavailable and the reasons for their absence.

Relief Requested

According to 52 USC § 20510(b), U4F and the additional aggrieved persons respectfully request that the states:

  • Investigate each documented record-level condition identified in the U4F Reports.
  • Produce, or make available for inspection, all records concerning the implementation of their state’s
    voter-list maintenance programs that are required to be maintained.
  • Provide a written explanation describing the procedures, policies, and implementation practices responsible for the documented record-level conditions identified.
  • Preserve all records relevant to the potential violations until the issues presented have been resolved.
  • Provide a written response addressing each record-level violation identified.

The purpose of this Notice is to provide the opportunity for voluntary compliance contemplated by Congress.

A Continued to Commitment to Lawful, Accurate and Transparent Elections

Unite4Freedom has examined official records in 35 states. In addition to identifying the apparent registration and voting violations in each state, U4F’s Election Validity Scorecards also demonstrate that in the 35 states studied, there is not one state where the certified election tally (ballots counted) matches the number of voters recorded as having voted in the election.

Additional analyses of these official records have resulted in U4F’s Vote Tampering Reports, which identify changes made to official records AFTER an election has been certified. These includes changes to voter-history and voter-registration records occurring across successive, official, statewide, voter-file snapshots without documentation to substantiate those revisions.

In Texas, U4F measured apparent vote tampering DURING the 2024 General Election and the 2026 Democratic and Republican Primary Elections. These reports expose problems that happen too frequently and follow patterns that don’t occur by chance or simple mistakes. The way the data changes over time suggests intentional or automated manipulation, not normal reporting errors.

All U4F analyses have identified significant issues within the election records that must be formally investigated and reviewed under state and federal election laws including record by record reconciliation and correction if necessary.

U4F will continue its non-partisan efforts to restore lawful, accurate, and transparent elections through whatever legal and legislative means necessary to fulfill this mission.

Valid elections are guaranteed in the Constitution and are the foundation of our Republic. Citizens have a right to demand accuracy. If elections are not lawful or accurate, then who is ultimately selecting our representatives?